|

KKK supporter
writing letter to imprisoned
husband. Extreme racism preys
easily on the politically confused,
when such notions are constantly
bolstered by supremacist ideas
found in the local culture and
a morally ambiguous media message. |
The
mainstream media downplay or ignore
the many demonstrations that progressive
forces have launched against war
and social injustice. But not all
demonstrators are slighted. Since
the early 1970s, when the press
first started announcing that the
country was in a "conservative mood," the
Ku Klux Klan has been accorded
generous coverage. Lengthy and
not altogether unsympathetic
articles have appeared in the
New York Times, Washington Post,
Associated Press, Time, Newsweek
and other publications. Klan
leaders, skinheads, and other
hatemongers have appeared on
just about every local and national
TV talk show. Indeed, the Klan
and the media have often seemed
entwined in a cozy embrace. The
press also displays a partiality
toward ultra-right political
candidates. Nazi-Klansman David
Duke received more national media
running for a seat in the Louisiania
state legislature than did socialist
Bernard Sanders running for the
U.S. Congress in Vermont and
winning. Likewise, right-wing
presidential candidates Pat Buchanan
and Ross Perot received immediate
and lavish media attention upon
announcing their intentions,
while the progressive Senator
Tom Harkin remained unseen and
largely unmentioned from day
one of his campaign. The corporate
media have a soft spot for right-wingers
and for hatemongers like the
KKK.
Do we want the press to cover
or ignore the Klan? The question
is poorly put. We certainly want
people to be informed about the
menace posed by hate groups like
the KKK and the American Nazi
Party, but we also do not want
the media to become promotional
weapons for fascists and racists.
So the question is not how much
coverage but the kind of coverage.
Here are some specific criticisms:
1. The press regularly fails
to report the Klan's worst features,
saying almost nothing in depth
about its racism, fascism, anticommunism
and anti-Semitism, and almost
nothing about its history of
violence, arson, terrorism, murder
and lynching. Some of that history
is not far past: in the last
fifteen years at least nine persons
have died at the hands of Klan
members, while scores have been
harassed, intimidated, or injured.
2. The press has lavished attention
on the Klan and Nazis, thereby
magnifying their visibility and
exaggerating their strength and
importance. Ten demonstrators
marching for some progressive
cause would not win national
media attention, but Klan and
Nazi gatherings of that size
have been treated as big news.
When the Klan held a much-publicized
rally just outside Washington,
D.C. in Montgomery County, Maryland,
numbering all of twenty-four
individuals in robes, 140 media
people were there to transmit
the event to national audiences.
The Nashville Tennessean once
ran a nine-part series on the
Klan. The series mentioned that
the KKK had "a dangerous
potential for violence and terror," but
it never elucidated the nature
of that potential nor mentioned
any specific acts. However, it
did offer a generous sampling
of the Klan's racist opinions.
Gannett news service quickly
shot the story over the wires
and all three major networks
reported it. As a result, the
Klan's "Imperial Wizard," who
liked the articles, started receiving
letters from people asking how
they could join. (The Tennessean
had conveniently published his
address.)
3. The press
downplays the anti-Klan demonstrators
whose numbers are many times
larger than KKK participants.
The political statement that
anti-Klan demonstrators make
on behalf of social justice and
against racism is usually ignored
by the press. The public is left
to conclude that they are just
hecklers spoiling for a fight.
Andy Stapp, an activist with
the Workers World Party, offers
some instances of double-standard
reporting:
• Anti-Klan
demonstrators outnumbered the
fascists ten to one at a KKK
rally in Connecticut, but CBS,
ABC and NBC all focused their
cameras on the Klan.
• Fifty Klansmen parading from Selma to Montgomery drew national attention
while 500 [civil rights advocates] marching against racism (67 of whom were
arrested) from Savannah to Reidsville prison the same week were virtually censored
out of the news.
• Ten armed KKK terrorists rate a six-column article and a large picture
in the New York Times, the same newspaper which printed not one word about
the 350,000 Black and White people who demonstrated together [for affirmative
action and civil rights] in Washington, DC, the capital of the U.S.
4. The press has no unkind
words about how police and government
agents collaborate with the Klan
and the Nazis, as when police
attack anti-Klan protesters,
and undercover agents--who supposedly
infiltrate the KKK to keep an
eye on it--end up playing key
organizing roles. One investigation
revealed that most of the Klan
chapters in certain parts of
the South were organized and
financed by the FBI. Back in
November 1979, a group of Klansmen
and Nazis murdered five Communist
Workers Party leaders and wounded
nine others at an anti-Klan rally
in Greensboro, N.C. The role
played by undercover agents in
organizing and arming the Greensboro
terrorists remained a story much
neglected by the major news media.
The media usually label communists
and socialists as the "extreme
left" and equate them with
the extreme right of Nazis and
Klansmen-- which is tantamount
to equating those who oppose
racism, anti-Semitism and union-busting
with those who support such things.
The left "extremists," however,
do not get the kind of lavish
media exposure accorded the Klan.
Thus, for years Charlene Mitchell
and Angela Davis headed a very
active multi-racial organization
known as the National Alliance
Against Racism and Political
Repression. But most people,
including many on the left, never
heard of the organization even
though one of its leaders was
a nationally known figure. Like
other anti-racist groups the
NAARPR suffered from a severe
case of media blackout. Fighting
racism simply is not news. Advocating
and practicing racism is news.
Nazis and Klanspeople may be
racist and violent but they are
not anti-capitalist--which might
explain why the corporate press
treats them so well. Indeed,
throughout much of its history
the Klan functioned as a union-busting
organization--as did the Nazis
in Germany in the early 1930s.
Both the Nazi party and the Klan
are explicitly anticommunist
and anti-socialist. At a demonstration
in Springfield, Massachusetts
the Klan distributed a leaflet
denouncing the "Black Socialist
Democratic People's Government" which
it claimed was plotting to overthrow "White
America." The Klan conjures
up imaginary threats to explain
away real social problems, attempting
to divide people along racial
lines by transforming their legitimate
economic grievances into a hatred
of Blacks, Jews, trade unionists,
communists, welfare recipients,
and advocates of affirmative
action. David Duke is correct:
his political agenda is really
not that different from George
Bush's.
The
media's coverage of the Klan
and the far Right in general
over the last twenty years has
done its part to keep conservative
forces in an ascendant mode.
The press gives maximum exposure
to the Klanspeople, Nazis, skinheads,
hatemongers, David Dukes, Pat
Buchanans--all of which widens
the rightward range of visible
discourse for the George Bushes.
Of course, the media do not see
it that way. They believe they
just go out and get the story.
Were they to join in the battle
against racism,
they would, by
their view, be guilty of "advocacy
journalism." So instead
of exposing hate groups the press
gives exposure to hate groups.
It's called "objectivity."
About
the Author
MICHAEL
PARENTI is an internationally known
writer and lecturer, and one of
the nation’s foremost
political analysts. He is the author
of eighteen books, including Democracy
for the Few, History
as Mystery, Make Believe Media,
The Terrorism Trap. His moving,
breakthrough analysis of ancient
Rome's class politics, The
Assassination of Julius Caesar:
A People’s
History of Ancient Rome was
voted, by unanimity, Book of the
Year (2004) and A Perennial Classic
by Cyrano's editors. A special
review and excerpts are being prepared
for this title. He has also published over
250 articles in scholarly journals,
political periodicals, popular
magazines, and nationally known
newspapers. Michael lives in
Berkeley, CA.
A good capsule
history of the KKK may be found here.
|